Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Posted ImageWelcome to the all new Geo Metro Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are features you can't use and images you can't see. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Join our community!




Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Hardest engines to work on?
Topic Started: Aug 15 2014, 08:54 PM (1,864 Views)
aartod


As far as the comments to on subaru engines, depends upon what engine you are talking about... 2.2L is so nice to work on or even the old 1.8, but if you are talking about the 2.5L- yeah it sucks to work on!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
truckjohn


There's no question... Jaguar!

Absolutely exactly NOTHING on those cars is made to work on without disassembling the ENTIRE car in the factory and putting a WHOLE NEW car together out of parts.....

If your Battery goes low - it wrecks the Fuel PUMP? WTF?

and the old engines were EVEN WORSE.... Sure - those old 12-cylinder engines run so smooth... if you can EVER get them running right with 12 separate 1-barrel carbs....

and LUCAS electrical systems.... It's no mistake that they call Lucas "The Prince of Darkness"....
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Woodie
Member Avatar


Good point truckjohn. Those inboard disk brakes were a real treat. $1,000 rear brake jobs were the norm, and I'm talking about 1970 dollars.


Edited by Woodie, Aug 22 2014, 05:53 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
robertino
Member Avatar


VOLVO...don't even try to mess with it if you don't have that stupid Special service tool to hold the cams on the other end ! Who even came up with that should be flogged!

Also the Rolls Royce engine was a pain in the --- .

But if you want to talk room...The Toyota Turbo AWD Celica. The guys in the shop would take a lunch or magically disappear when one of those showed up !!! :oshit
Edited by robertino, Aug 25 2014, 03:13 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
perfesser
Member Avatar
Elite Member - Former Metro owner

I never had any problem accessing the engine in my 1960 Volvo 544, except for the idiot who placed the side draft carbs directly over the exhaust manifold. :O :O Back when they were common, I saw 5 of them have engine fires due to that. Mine died a different death, though.
Edited by perfesser, Aug 25 2014, 12:33 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
robertino
Member Avatar


perfesser
Aug 25 2014, 09:45 AM
I never had any problem accessing the engine in my 1960 Volvo 544, except for the idiot who placed the side draft carbs directly over the exhaust manifold. :O :O Back when they were common, I saw 5 of them have engine fires due to that. Mine died a different death, though.
NO NO not the old Volvo's I'm talking about the 90's and up. They need this slotted tool to keep the cams from moving when you are working on the head, and it mounts on the back of the cams. You'd think with all the over heating issues that those 5 cyl Volvo engines had , they'd come up with a simpler tool or locking mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · The Geo Metro Lounge · Next Topic »
Add Reply